The circular economy (CE) is an inspirational strategy for creating value for the economy, society and business while minimising resource use and environmental impacts trough reducing, re-using and recycling. In contrast, life cycle assessment (LCA) is a robust and science-based tool to measure the environmental impacts of products, services and business models. Combine both the robustness of the LCA methodology and the inspirational principles of CE and you have a holistic approach for innovation. In this part of the 2-fold blog: why would you combine LCA and CE?
Circular economy business models
In a linear economy, goods are designed for a single lifetime, and are disposed of at the end of their useful life – in most cases, destined for a landfill. Circular economy is based on a ‘systems-thinking approach’ that gives rise to different strategies. This systems-thinking approach helps to spot opportunities for ‘closing the loops’ in biological cycles(restoring non-toxic materials into the biosphere while rebuilding natural capital) and technical cycles (reducing the dependence on virgin materials by restoring products, components and materials into the market at the highest quality possible and for as long as possible; The Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2012)
In this sense, circular economy challenges industry to redefine products and services, for example by offering products on a service basis or extending their lifespan, using renewable energy, integrating recyclable or biodegradable resources, promoting collaborative consumption or creating symbiotic relationships where the waste of one industry becomes the resource of another.
How do we know if we are achieving ‘circular success’?
One way to determine the success of a CE strategy at the product level is to use the Material Circularity Indicator(MCI). This indicator helps to measure which linear flow has been minimised and which restorative flow maximised for its component materials, and how long and intensively a product is used compared to a similar industry-average product (The Ellen MacArthur Foundation, et al., 2015).
Figure 1: Material Flows for MCI calculation (source: The Ellen MacArthur Foundation, et al., 2015)
To determine circularity, the MCI analyses a combination of product characteristics (See Figure 1):
- use of virgin materials – the fraction of virgin materials used in the product
- use of re-used materials and recycled content in the product
- the efficiency of recycling
- the mass of unrecoverable waste that goes to landfill or incineration
- a utility factor that accounts for the duration and intensity of the product’s use
From this information, the MCI generates a score between 0 and 1. Let me give you an example: A product that utilises 100% virgin materials is given a MCI close to 0, which means the product is ‘linear’. On the other hand, a product that uses a large amount of recycled materials, has an extended lifespan and a high recycling efficiency will yield MCI values closer to 1. Pretty straightforward, isn’t it? Well, in practice, it’s not that simple…
Closing loops is not enough
When designers or companies incorporate circular economy strategies in the design phase or development of products or services, one question often arises: which CE strategy is the most beneficial for the environment and my product? At this point we know that closing loops by itself is not a guarantee for success. For example, using recycled materials could impact the lifetime of a product due to quality loss or add other impacts in energy use or water which cannot be foreseen with the MCI. Reuse of components may add to impacts through the additional transport required for collection, which is also something not accounted in the MCI methodology.
In this phase of uncertainty about how to choose the best strategy among recycling, reuse, and other end-of-life recovery options, Life Cycle Assessment is a perfect tool to consistently and effectively evaluate these options.
Assessing life cycles to uncover the facts
LCA is a robust and science-based tool based on the ISO 14040/44 standards (International Organization for Standardization, 2006). It is used to assess the environmental impact of products, services and business models throughout their life cycles — from the extraction of raw materials to manufacturing, distribution, use, and disposal. This is why the combined use of LCA and CE allows product developers to actually measure environmental performance, compare circular strategies and ensure a positive environmental balance from the design of new circular products.
Furthermore, LCA requires much of the same data as the MCI does, so these metrics are complementary with relatively little effort. It is important to note that the MCI concentrates on the flow of materials throughout the manufacture and use of the product, explicitly encouraging the use of recycled or reused materials and product life extension. In contrast, LCA focuses on deriving environmental impacts at a life cycle level, where it may not always be an undivided good to emphasise circularity.
Inspiration and clear direction: the power is in the combination
Although the circular economy strategies are inspiring, there is still no clear view about how to transform circular economy into mainstream practices. Therefore, combining CE and LCA can be a great way for designers, innovators, sustainability managers, consultants and consumers to look into matters they may not have considered before.
In the next part of this series, I’ll show you how to measure Circular Economy with LCA, combining the MCI and LCA results using SimaPro. Through a practical seven-steps guide, we will explore how to make sure that circular economy thinking will actually reduce the negative environmental impacts of products.
Elsa at CILCA
Last June, I presented this work at the CILCA conference, the International Conference on Life Analysis in Latin America. If you would like to know more about the work presented at CILCA or about the topic circular economy and how to combine it with LCA, please contact me. I would love to help you find the best way to implement both methodologies.
The original post appeared originally at pre-sustainability.com, on May 16th, 2017